Prejudice = Bullying

Posted by Bruce - in arts and entertainment, Blog, Philosophy, Political - No Comments

     

    After watching the film “42” I realized that throughout history prejudice has been used as a form of sanctioned bullying. Whether this prejudice was based on race, religion, creed or sex it enabled those who had a grudge against society to find an escape goat for all their problems. Those in power supported even tacitly using the blame game because it would inoculate them from the blame they actually deserved.  Those who want to stand up for the victims are afraid to as this bully (the one with the big mouth) intimitates them through their own power structure. 

    Today this form of prejudice is predominately seen  in the political debate where those with different political opinions from the mainstream are labeled by the political elite. For example once you are labeled an extremist it is okay for those in power to ridicule you and push you down. We lose the great insight of these individuals  because their ideas are never fully discussed and debated in the mainstream. Engaging in this form of bullying for any reason is wrong and we should instead have a rational debate with respect to all sides. Therefore the next time someone from “your side” uses a deragotary label on someone from the otherside stand up and tell them that you don’t accept this label and want to hear their point of view. Whether that voice come from a  black, white,  Jew, Christian, Muslim, Republican, Tea Party, Leftist, and or combination of the above all voices deserve to be heard, respected and debated.

 

A Prejudice that continues and nobody is fighting against including me

Posted by Bruce - in arts and entertainment, Blog, Philosophy, Political - No Comments

                  

              Prejudice is to have a preconceived judgment on someone without them evening saying a word. Today all around the world certain individuals are given preferential treatment in employment, discounts, and in general, life.  Please note that there is some hard work and expense to keep up this advantage over others yet it is not equivalent to the hard work that others must perform just to keep up. I honestly have to say that I carry this prejudice around as well.  This prejudice is based on “looks”.

              Let’s face it those with good looks have a step above us in finding employment opportunities, getting discounts at stores (who turns the pretty woman) and sitting at the best seats in a restaurant. Yes, it might take time, effort, and monies (hair stylist, plastic surgery) to keep up this advantage, but it’s basically a gift from G-D to some and not others.

     How can we fight such prejudice or should we? Should we change our policy and give up our seat to the ugly man or woman? Should we make sure we employ ugly people at stores like Victoria’s Secret? Should there be quotes of ugly people working at stores? I for one say no! Adding beauty to our daily routines makes them more enjoyable, exciting and fun. The solution is simple when we see beauty let us share that beauty in the way we act toward others who might not have this advantage in life.  Let us also realize and take into account our own prejudice on looks that we carry everyday and pledge to not only see the beauty from the outside but the beauty within when we judge an individual.

   Are you looking for a job any job just call me? Oops I’m sliding.

Insane- Script- Fiction or reality

Posted by Bruce - in Blog, Philosophy, Political, Uncategorized - No Comments

It’s scary how current events can lead us right down the path of insanity (the script).

NSA breaks privacy rules -Click -Washington Post

What you watch they can be watching- Click to view

The campaign to get “Insane” produced continues with discussions with the legal and artistic talent involved in the project to start an Indiegogo campaing. Details coming soon (including how you might get  involved in the campaign ad)

 

Foreign Aid? – With tough conditions- Egypt Bewarned

Posted by Bruce - in Blog, Political - No Comments

I’m sick and tired of our hard earned monies going to countries that work against our interest. It is time that we tie that foreign aid to conditions on the ground. Here is how that could work (below).

1.  110% of the aid given to a country that practices the following points

A (25%). is our ally and a friend to our other allies

B (25)  is a democracy or leaning to it

C.  (25%), allow basic human rights to all its citizens

D.  (25%) doesn’t permit the teaching of anti-Semitic, racist or sexist in their public  school curriculum

E.  (10 %) Permits free trade between our countries.

If a country fails to fully meet any of the criteria above fully then their aid will be lessened by at least the noted amount  above ( example not a democracy or leaning -25 %)

Stop, Question then maybe Frisk

Posted by Bruce - in Blog, Political, Solutions - No Comments

I am all for security but there is a difference between security and living in a police state. We need to balance the right to feel secure on our streets with the right to feel secure being ourselves. Therefore before a police officer is allowed to “stop and frisk” these following procedures should be taken.

1) The police must work with community officials and religious leaders on a regular basis to discuss their prospective on this issue and how best to implement the policy without harassment.

2) The police must have a devise to record the incident from the beginning.

3) They must clarify to the individual why they are being stopped (ex investigation in the area)

4) They must tell the individual their rights that they have before being “frisked”

5) The police must ask a question(s) to insure that the frisk is necessary.

6) If the individual is clear of any wrong doing the police must give the individual a report stating that the time and date of the incident that they can give to an employer or friend if late for a meeting.  They must also apologize to the individual for the inconvenience and thank them for the cooperation with the investigation.

Anti Drugs/ Pro legalization with caveat(s)

Posted by Bruce - in Blog, Law and Justice, Philosophy, Political - No Comments

 What am I talking about? (read below)

I feel that illegal drugs have done incredible harm to our society. We have seen innocent people shot as bystanders of the violence that occurs in the drug war. We have seen the great talents of our youth destroyed by the epidemic of drug use?

The truth is we can’t stop a product that the people want unless we are willing to lock up all the users of this product for a serious period of time. I believe many things adults do to their own bodies is wrong but as long as they’re educated on the consequence, don’t hurt others and have a clear way out then it’s should be up to the individual to be stupid or not be stupid. These steps (below) though need to be taken before any legalization occurs.

(1) Those that seek to use these substances must get a license which requires them to be educated on the consequences of their future actions and know where their are resources available to kick the habit.

(2) Store front locations must be set where people can utilize these drugs but these individuals must not be permitted to drive home until their effect has fully been relinquished from their system. Individuals can take these substances from their own home but must have a certified provider in the vicinity to insure that they don’t drive after taking such substances or cause harm to others. The facilities that provide these substances and/or the provider must have information clearly available on the possible consequences of utilizing such substances and information on how to quit.

(3) All these substances will be heavily taxed and those taxes will go directly to anti-drug campaigns for youths and the most effective drug rehabilitation centers.

(4) Individuals who have such licenses must agree to have semi-annually check ups on their mental and physical health.

(5) Youths must not be exposed to the use of these substances.