The 15:17 to Paris film is being panned by critics alike as it receives only 20% from that “talent” which poses possible Conspiracy Theories (below). Of course the audience review isn’t much stronger at 45 % but then I’ll have to add an additional conspiracy theory after I see the film. Or should I maybe it’s just not as good as the previews or maybe….?
(1) ACTORS GUILD- The actors put pressure on critics to protect their industry from those who just enter it to perform suddenly in a movie. Director Clint Easton selected the real heroes to portray themselves and if this was to succeed movies in the future might not need top $$ named actors in them. For directors and editors could make “Tom” look and act like a “Cruise”
(2) CRITICS PROTECTION- Critics were extra critical of those who decided to jump into acting looking for faults under a microscope not only to protect actors but their critical jobs as a whole.
(3) POLITICAL INCORRECT- Portraying service in the military as a good act that prepares one for life as well as the positive religious undercurrent may not be the message the critics could really understand as being realistic.
[youtube_sc url=”https://youtu.be/IC_lnyn2R2Q”]