I finally realized that it might not be “justice for all” but who presents the best story which will decides where a verdict will go. The story isn’t necessarily the truth because few were probably there but the one that “appears” the most believable at that moment. For example Robert Mueller will never truly find out exactly what happened with “Russian Collusion” but will try to present a story that has the least amount of holes in it. He will try to paint a picture of the President and his team based on the colors that he has on hand whether they be true or not and those colors will have to be one’s a jury/society can identify with. “Power/ Greed will be the motivating force in such a story whether they actually made people act in a certain way or were completely fabricated is not important it’s the story that it helps propel. Calling a grand jury is just having the stage for this story to be told. The truth will lie (literally) in between the lines of this story and somehow have to seep through a good story teller/ lawyer.