Philosophy

Stephen Hawking has attacked Donald Trump for being a Demogogue & you have to wonder if he can Trump this attack.  Donald Trump can’t attack his brilliance because that is well accepted by society and attacking a person in Stephen Hawking’s condition will seem cruel even in the Trump’s world so what kind of attack can he mount or will he just ignore the comments. Ignoring an attack is not in Donald’s playbook or any playbooks that are in his black hole.   I believe he’ll probably  say something such as “Some individuals who appear brilliant and have their head in the cloud should learn to focus on the threats that exist right here such as ISIS and not try to use my name to sell their latest failed book.” Not bad for someone who isn’t in the Donald’s head.

President Obama’s speech in Hiroshima seem to point the blame of the war on the United States as he continues to bow down to the world on his perceptions of American failures. If only I had written the first few lines here’s what I would have him say.

Today I stand in a spot that over 70 years ago was where a decisive action led to a sudden end of a horrible war that killed millions of innocent life’s and although the destructive power of this weapon caused the death of thousands we will never know how many thousands of lives were saved by it’s use in the first place. For battles through cities and streets where death was considered an honor would have continued for months if not years longer.  Today we use this weapons as a defender of freedom and peace around the world as their destructive power G-D willing will continue to prevent world destruction as we’ve seen too often in our past…. WHICH SPEECH IS BETTER?

A Donald Trump/ Bernie Sanders debate would point the finger directly on Hillary Clinton leaving her in big trouble in the general election. For this debate would be a huge event with record audience watching as Hillary Clinton is left in the dust. It would appear that Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump were willing to speak directly to the American people while Hillary Clinton needed more time to be “real”.  So let the political  fireworks begin and in the end the only one hit by the sparks will be Hillary Clinton.

When a trial occurs and an individual is not convicted of the crime we usually say they are not guilty but in the case of Edward Nero I will go a step forward and say he was found INNOCENT. For when the case is prosecuted as if it was a political circus not bent on reaching the truth but advancing a political narrative justice becomes blinded to only one side.  It took an incredible amount of courage for the juror’s to not find for the prosecutor in this case and therefore they must not only believed that Edward Nero’s was not guilty but totally innocent of these charges.  May this be a step in seeing that justice be based on facts rather then what is politically expedient.

What do Terry McAuliffe & Hillary Clinton have in common other then their kisses are phony? Is it that they’re both under FBI investigation for serious abuse of  power close but not yet there? The sad truth is no matter what the crime they might be guilty not only will they not be convicted but they won’t even be tried. For as long as we have a campaigner in the White House justice is only served to his opponents.  Does anyone get indicted when the IRS becomes part of the DNC no of course not?  Will anyone get in trouble when our Ambassador and 3 brave American’s are killed in Libya because of negligent behavior by government officials well let’s see what party is in charge? What makes matters worse is that our 5th estate will ignore this abuse of power unless it is on an Elephant’s foot. Justice is for all in America who don’t happen to be leaders in the party of Asses.