Last night I was eating dinner with loved one’s when I mentioned that if we replaced Monica Lewinsky with Marilyn Monroe it would be a more understandable act. This seemed like a pretty recognizable fact that a person could understand temptation better when the image was let’s say more tempting. Yet I was accused of sexism and treating woman as an object and that this topic was off limits. I give you the following items of defense (below) before I’m condemned to censorship.
(1)BOTH WAYS- I understand if a woman felt the same way between Brad Pitt and let’s say Pee Wee Herman. Sorry Pee Wee know one wants to play in your playhouse.
(2) VOICE- I’d add that if Marilyn Monroe had a Mickey Mouse voice she may not be as tempting.
(3) SCIENCE/FAITH- I think this is one area where science and faith agree that it is part of the human being’s biological make up and even soul to be attracted to a person you find more attractive physically.
(4) APPLE & UGLY FRUIT- How many “progressive people” will choose the Ugly Fruit (actually name of a fruit) vs the Apple? I actually have tried an ugly fruit and it’s ugly inside as well.
(5) 
Just in case you needed another picture to prove the case.